I was a little startled to read today that both the BBC and The Guardian were speculating that Gordom Brown becoming Prime Minister would mean the end of Peter Mandelson as European Commissioner for Trade. The Guardian even talks of ‘speculation in Brussels’ as being behind this. Mandelson has himself rightly rubbished the rumours. European Commissioners are not there to be a Member State’s representative in Brussels. They are there to act in the European interest, with the Commission being tasked to carry out certain tasks as stipulated by the EU’s treaties. Brown could not call Mandelson back, even if he wanted to. He might invite Mandelson to resign, but only Mandelson himself could do so. So today’s speculation is not only incorrect, but it also gives completely the wrong impression about the relationship between a Member State and a Commissioner. No surprise British journalists have not done their research.
Latest blog posts by e-mail
If you wanted Liberal Democrat or Labour candidates to stand down at the General Election, where should you do it?
Extend Article 50 then oust Johnson? Or oust Johnson so as to guarantee the extension of Article 50? This week’s crucial question
🇪🇺 citizen, 🇬🇧 passport, 🇩🇪 resident. Teaches @CollegeofEurope. Blogs about EU, politics, #Brexit. Makes #BrexitDiagram. Travel 🚅 🚲. Member @die_gruenen
Written a fortnight ago.
He’s not been heard since.
Maybe they’re not so stupid in CCHQ.
Also surely any sensible Tory strategist ought to keep Rees-Mogg off the airwaves for the whole election. He comes across as unpleasant and entitled - neither things that resonate positively.
Or is there some Classic Dom I don’t get here?
Brexiter running against Anna Soubry banned from constituency after harassing MP https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/election-anna-soubry-brexit-amy-dalla-mura-broxtowe-party-a9211376.html
No Creative Commons Image in this post. Please note the general Creative Commons statement in the footer.