The European Commission and the state owned railway companies are getting very excited about the idea there could be a EU masterplan for high speed rail.
With that in mind, let’s do a little thought experiment. This started as a Bluesky thread, and has been lightly edited into this blog entry.
Let’s assume that – short term – the best bet is to run more trains on existing high speed infrastructure, rather than building new high speed lines.
So imagine right now you have a fleet of 4 voltage, all signalling systems you want, 200m long, approved to run anywhere high speed trains (300km/h speed). Where do you deploy them? And as this is to be an EU plan, let’s focus on cross border routes.
I’d start with
Amsterdam ๐ณ๐ฑ – Bruxelles ๐ง๐ช – Paris ๐ซ๐ท
Eurostar (ex-Thalys) hasn’t added capacity here for 2 decades. it’s mostly high speed infrastructure. On Bruxelles – Paris there is plenty of capacity, through Antwerp a bit as well. Big cities, big demand, Eurostar costly. A no brainer.
Next would be
Paris ๐ซ๐ท / Bruxelles ๐ง๐ช – London ๐ฌ๐ง
Yes as my #CrossChannelRail project showed, there are operational headaches through the Channel Tunnel, but there is – at least on the core routes – spare capacity too. Extend to Kรถln ๐ฉ๐ช, Frankfurt ๐ฉ๐ช, Basel ๐จ๐ญ or Zรผrich ๐จ๐ญ too if you want.
Then I’d look at
Paris ๐ซ๐ท – Germany ๐ฉ๐ช
There are between 5x and 7x a day to Frankfurt ๐ฉ๐ช, and 2 routes (via Saarbrรผcken or via Strasbourg), and Stuttgart ๐ฉ๐ช and Mรผnchen ๐ฉ๐ช are under served too. Yes, distances are long, but Frankfurt is time competitive with โ๏ธ
Then it would be
Paris ๐ซ๐ท – Barcelona ๐ช๐ธ
Yes, this takes 6.5 hours, but there are only 2x or 3x trains a day, but 6x a day to Perpignan from Paris! Add Bcn to Toulouse ๐ซ๐ท, Lyon ๐ซ๐ท, Marseille ๐ซ๐ท and you could use some trains here
Now it’s getting a bit harder, but
Paris ๐ซ๐ท – Zรผrich ๐จ๐ญ
This has more potential than a service every two hours it has currently, not least as the “other” hours there’s a Paris – Mulhouse ๐ซ๐ท TGV that gets to within 20km of the border So there’s a little more you can do on this route
Likewise hard, as the infra through Chambรฉry, Modane is slow… but
Paris ๐ซ๐ท – Milano ๐ฎ๐น
ought to have more than 4 trains a day each way (2 TGVs, 2 Frecciarossa currently), not least as more stopping in Lyon ๐ซ๐ท could make sense.
Then
Zรผrich ๐จ๐ญ / Basel ๐จ๐ญ or Genรจve ๐จ๐ญ – Montpellier ๐ซ๐ท – Barcelona ๐ช๐ธ / Madrid ๐ช๐ธ
These routes would likely be highly seasonal, so would probably not be top of the list to do. But time wise, especially from Geneva, this would be workable
Next would be
Roma ๐ฎ๐น – Verona ๐ฎ๐น – Innsbruck ๐ฆ๐น – Mรผnchen ๐ฉ๐ช And Roma ๐ฎ๐น – Venezia ๐ฎ๐น – Wien ๐ฆ๐น (once Koralmbahn open later this year)
Here all the high speed is on the Italian side, and at least Roma – Mรผnchen is in planning. But I think you could squeeze some more out of either of these routes
Perhaps
Zรผrich ๐จ๐ญ / Basel ๐จ๐ญ – Dijon ๐ซ๐ท – Charles de Gaulle โ๏ธ ๐ซ๐ท – Lille ๐ซ๐ท – Bruxelles ๐ง๐ช
At the moment this route needs a complex change across Paris, so eliminating that would make sense. Although there are probably not more than 2x or 3x a day to run here
And then…
What have we got?
There are some high-ish speed lines, like Berlin ๐ฉ๐ช / Hamburg ๐ฉ๐ช – Amsterdam ๐ณ๐ฑ, or Hamburg ๐ฉ๐ช – Berlin ๐ฉ๐ช – Praha ๐จ๐ฟ, or Kรธbenhavn ๐ฉ๐ฐ – Hamburg ๐ฉ๐ช that need better services, but you’d not use 300km/h trains on these. Anything Spain ๐ช๐ธ – Portugal ๐ต๐น needs dual gauge trains, so is hard to do just now.
And there are some high speed projects in planning or being built that might in a few years change the picture:
Fehmarn Belt ๐ฉ๐ฐ-๐ฉ๐ช
Praha-Brno ๐จ๐ฟ
Rail Baltica ๐ต๐ฑ๐ฑ๐น๐ฑ๐ป๐ช๐ช
CPK Project ๐ต๐ฑ
Lyon-Torino ๐ซ๐ท๐ฎ๐น
Basque-Y ๐ช๐ธ (implication for ๐ซ๐ท)
So then – short term – what matters?
๐ซ๐ท
And ๐ซ๐ท again
And then ๐ซ๐ท some more
If you want to boost high speed passenger rail in Europe, short term, pretty much ALL of the routes you need to sort out start or end in France
But
What is the only country in Europe to have reduced the size of its high speed train fleet?
Yes, that’s ๐ซ๐ท
Has removed Spanish signalling from some of its TGVs so they cannot cross the border into Spain?
Yes, that’s ๐ซ๐ท
Hasn’t installed the right version of ETCS on its TGVs to use them on German high speed lines?
Yeah, that’s ๐ซ๐ท
Has been really sluggish installing ETCS on its own high speed lines so as to allow others to run on its own high speed lines?
Yes, that’s ๐ซ๐ท (well, and ๐ฉ๐ช)
Has refused to allow Renfe’s Talgo 106 to run on its high speed lines?
Yeah, you guessed it – ๐ซ๐ท
(FWIW this one actually might be justified)
So basically if the European Commission wants to do something about high speed rail, cross border, in the short term it needs to pick up the phone and speak to Paris.
There used to be a TEE line from Geneva to Barcelona. The first step to get a high speed line from Switzerland to the south-west would be to have a good IC connection between Lyon and Geneva.
Currently there is only a TER that takes two hours, it takes 1:45 by car, mostly because A40 has a much straighter path.
Given the importance of both cities, you would think this would be an obvious developmentโฆ
Sort of. I know the Swiss are disappointed with how bad that Lyon-Genรจve line is, but as it’s 90% in France and the French government doesn’t want to do anything about it, and the Rรฉgion (AURA) doesn’t care either…
Well, basically, yes, I agree, but you can explain why it’s poor.